N880EAP wrote:Lisa's inconsistencies could possibly be explained in a few ways:
1. She said what she said before, because it was intended as such purely for public consumption at the time. Maybe later (book) was the actual truth.
(I think the book is definitely embellished to sell more copies and one example has already been pointed out earlier in this thread.)
2. Maybe Lisa's brain/memory has been "influenced" (more bluntly put, .... fried) by various/previous drugs/medication use (i.e., unreliable).
(Sorry, if harsh, but it is what it is. Lisa even admits to hard drug abuse in her book.)
3. Maybe both/all the above are at play.
----------------------------
One thing is for sure, in my opinion, after having read her book. It/she has no depth. (I understand that the book was probably written in haste . . . . i.e., an early unfinished pre-draft, etc., ..... but still .......
I am sorry, but I just don't care about the Lisa stuff, and even much less so the Riley stuff.
-----------------------------
The book was a quick and easy (meaning simple) read and (unfortunately) added very little to what we already know about our main guy.
(If one is into Priscilla or Lisa, then it added "more", of course. It was sad and like I said before, it reads more like a catharsis for both of the authors.)
I agree. Lisa comes off shallow, spoiled and kind of a simpleton. Part of the problem is she was in the very preliminary phase of writing this book so it wasn’t anywhere near being completed. She had likely already been paid for it or had received a large advance and the publisher was maybe asking for the money back or deliver a book.
The other problem is at the time of recording her stories for the book she was at a low point with her mother with their up and down relationship. So in her recordings she was throwing her mother under the bus. But had she lived to put the book together to its completion, I wonder if she would have actually kept that in about her mother?