alberta sheffield wrote:I just don't appreciate the posted innuendo.
Somebody says something out of the blue and gets applauded for it. No explanation?
Not nice at all.
Under this circumstances i will not post here at all.
Mister Moon wrote:alberta sheffield wrote:Hi,
thanks for allowing me here. Just was reading here before as a strict guest.
Just thought i use a proper thread.
I am a fan of elvis for 30 years now with all the ups and down included.
Alberta
Hi pacer.
Mountain Mist wrote:alberta sheffield wrote:Hi,
thanks for allowing me here. Just was reading here before as a strict guest.
Just thought i use a proper thread.
I am a fan of elvis for 30 years now with all the ups and down included.
Alberta
Come on over to the chatting spot, Alberta.
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=12860&p=168602#p168602
alberta sheffield wrote:Hi, looked in for a second now here.
It might be new or maybe the standard here to welcome new members this way.
Still it is not nice and makes me not want to participate here really.
Colin B wrote:alberta sheffield wrote:Hi, looked in for a second now here.
It might be new or maybe the standard here to welcome new members this way.
Still it is not nice and makes me not want to participate here really.
For some reason, it was thought that you were a previous member [who left under a cloud] coming back with a new username.
Don't know why some made that assumption.
!
alberta sheffield wrote:...are you sure the part i quoted from you wasn't slightly tongue in cheek?
alberta sheffield wrote:Ok. Thank you in this case.
The second nice, besides of the one from Mountain Mist (although i was not getting her message completely with the link etc.) , post here towards me.
The rest offended me in a way - because the joke was on me for reasons i still don't understand.
alberta sheffield wrote:I think i made clear what i meant.
alberta sheffield wrote:It's not hard to understand,
[color=#FF0000]It is if you don't make yourself clear, which you still haven't.[/color]
The first person called me a previous member and you gave him a "thank you".
The second one did hint what the first person did.
That throwed me off a little for a start -cause I was not "in" on such things.
That's what I meant.
No more no less.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests