Colin B wrote:cadillac-elvis wrote:"Elvis-Off stage" would have been a great title for a home recordings CD.
Or an 'in the studio' one...
yep.
Colin B wrote:cadillac-elvis wrote:"Elvis-Off stage" would have been a great title for a home recordings CD.
Or an 'in the studio' one...
John wrote:KEV wrote:19th FEB should and could have made it 2xdisc set.
But the well is running dry and they need to keep stuff back for other times!!!.
What's the point of keeping it back? The well of buyers is also running dry.
WalterHaleJnr wrote:John wrote:KEV wrote:19th FEB should and could have made it 2xdisc set.
But the well is running dry and they need to keep stuff back for other times!!!.
What's the point of keeping it back? The well of buyers is also running dry.
well said. Plus Ernst and Roger need to realise that we're not getting any younger
Jak wrote:The On Stage release is a nice change of pace.
OnStage55 wrote:Strange title OFF-ON STAGE, I don't get what they mean by OFF, sounds like it means that Elvis was OFF on doing a good show.
They should remove that one word and leave the rest, sounds better.
Mojo Filter wrote:OnStage55 wrote:Strange title OFF-ON STAGE, I don't get what they mean by OFF, sounds like it means that Elvis was OFF on doing a good show.
They should remove that one word and leave the rest, sounds better.
Only just visiting this thread, even though it's three pages long, and I'm sure someone's already said what I'm about to say but I would imagine the "OFF" means rehearsal material and "On" means the actual live on stage performances.
Still, it is a strange title "OFF-ON". I would have put it as "OFF and ON STAGE.
WalterHaleJnr wrote:Mojo Filter wrote:OnStage55 wrote:Strange title OFF-ON STAGE, I don't get what they mean by OFF, sounds like it means that Elvis was OFF on doing a good show.
They should remove that one word and leave the rest, sounds better.
Only just visiting this thread, even though it's three pages long, and I'm sure someone's already said what I'm about to say but I would imagine the "OFF" means rehearsal material and "On" means the actual live on stage performances.
Still, it is a strange title "OFF-ON". I would have put it as "OFF and ON STAGE.
i'm not as bothered as other members seem to be with the choice of title. FTD have provided worse. To me what matters and is of great importance is who will be mastering the product this time? Is it going to be the same dill head who mastered Omaha and Murfreesboro releases ?
WalterHaleJnr wrote:John wrote:KEV wrote:19th FEB should and could have made it 2xdisc set.
But the well is running dry and they need to keep stuff back for other times!!!.
What's the point of keeping it back? The well of buyers is also running dry.
well said. Plus Ernst and Roger need to realise that we're not getting any younger
Tulsa Mclean wrote:WalterHaleJnr wrote:John wrote:KEV wrote:19th FEB should and could have made it 2xdisc set.
But the well is running dry and they need to keep stuff back for other times!!!.
What's the point of keeping it back? The well of buyers is also running dry.
well said. Plus Ernst and Roger need to realise that we're not getting any younger
Neither them, they are already into their late 60´s.... .
-Ernst Jorgensen (1950)
-Roger Semon (1949)
Mojo Filter wrote:WalterHaleJnr wrote:Mojo Filter wrote:OnStage55 wrote:Strange title OFF-ON STAGE, I don't get what they mean by OFF, sounds like it means that Elvis was OFF on doing a good show.
They should remove that one word and leave the rest, sounds better.
Only just visiting this thread, even though it's three pages long, and I'm sure someone's already said what I'm about to say but I would imagine the "OFF" means rehearsal material and "On" means the actual live on stage performances.
Still, it is a strange title "OFF-ON". I would have put it as "OFF and ON STAGE.
i'm not as bothered as other members seem to be with the choice of title. FTD have provided worse. To me what matters and is of great importance is who will be mastering the product this time? Is it going to be the same dill head who mastered Omaha and Murfreesboro releases ?
That's a question i can't answer. I know nothing about the mastering issues on the releases you've mentioned here because i don't own them, or any other releases with mastering issues of the ones i have bought, and have no intention of buying them as 70s Elvis doesn't much appeal to me, so i can't comment.
But suffice to say, if there is such faults then that's very sloppy work from FTD and a big let down for the fans buying them.
WalterHaleJnr wrote:Tulsa Mclean wrote:WalterHaleJnr wrote:John wrote:KEV wrote:19th FEB should and could have made it 2xdisc set.
But the well is running dry and they need to keep stuff back for other times!!!.
What's the point of keeping it back? The well of buyers is also running dry.
well said. Plus Ernst and Roger need to realise that we're not getting any younger
Neither them, they are already into their late 60´s.... .
-Ernst Jorgensen (1950)
-Roger Semon (1949)
Oh no Tulsa, you shouldn't have given too much info re. their age. " on the wrong side of 60" would have been enough, my friend
Users browsing this forum: billbruce, cadillac-elvis, clausdk and 39 guests